La complejidad del conocimiento: retos para su eficaz creación y transferencia en la organización innovadora
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2012.1479Palavras-chave:
Complejidad del conocimiento, creación de conocimiento, transferencia deComplejidad del conocimiento, transferencia de conocimiento, aprendizaje organizativo, innovación.Resumo
Una eficaz creación y transferencia de conocimiento es esencial para promover el aprendizaje organizativo y la innovación. Con este postulado como idea principal, este artículo explora sendos casos de proyectos de gestión del conocimiento en dos empresas españolas, profundizando en tres características problemáticas del conocimiento:dispersión, ambigüedad y perturbación. Los resultados recomiendan diseñar cuidadosamente el proyecto de gestión de conocimiento teniendo en cuenta: el propósito de la
Downloads
Referências
Alegre, J. & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326.
Argote, L., McEvily, B. & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571-582.
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time, and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it's time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.
Bogenrieder, I. & Nooteboom, B. (2004). Learning groups: What types are there? Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326.
Bontis, N., Crossan, M.M. & Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437-469.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-ofpractice. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
Cabrera, A. & Cabrera, E.F. (2002). Knowledge- sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687-710.
Carlile, P.R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
Christensen, C., Bohmer, R. & Kenagy, J. (2000). Will disruptive innovations cure health care?. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 102-112.
Christensen, P.H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 36-47.
Cook S.D. & Brown J.S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381-400.
Crossan, M.M., Lane, H.W. & White, R.E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
Davenport, T.H., De Long, D.W. & Beers, M.C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43- 57.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1), 7-18.
Holstein, J.A. & Gubrium, J.F. (1997). Active interviewing. En D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research – Theory, method and practice (pp. 113-129). Londres: Sage.
Hsiao, R.-L., Dun-Hou, S. & Lee, C.-F. (2006). The problems of embedness: Knowledge transfer, coordination and reuse in information systems. Organization Studies, 27(9), 1289-1317.
Karlsen, J.T. & Gottschalk, P. (2004). Factors affecting knowledge transfer in IT projects. Engineering Management Journal, 16(1), 3-10.
King, N. (1994). The qualitative research interview. In Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (Eds.). Qualitative methods in organizational research, 15-36. Londres: Sage.
Kofman, F. & Senge, P.M. (1993). Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 5-23.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Levin, D.Z. & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust. The mediating effect of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Martiny, M. (1998). Knowledge management at HP consulting. Organizational Dynamics, 27(2), 71-77.
Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McCampbell, A.S., Moorhead, C. & Gitters, S.H. (1999). Knowledge management: The new challenge for the 21st century. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(3), 172-179.
McDermott, R. & O'Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76-85.
McInerney, C. (2002). Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1009-1018.
McKenzie, J, Truc, A. & Van Winkelen, C. (2001). Winning commitment for knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Change Management, 2(2), 115-127.
Newell, S. (2005). Knowledge transfer and learning: Problems of knowledge transfer associated with trying to short-circuit the learning cycle. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 2(3), 275-290.
Newell, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Scarbrough, H. & Swan, J. (2006). Sharing knowledge across projects: Limits to ICTled project review practices. Management Learning, 37(2), 167-185.
Newell, S., Swan, J. & Scarbrough, H. (2001). From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: Contradictory outcomes of intranet development. British Journal of Management, 12(2), 97-112.
Newell, S., Tansley, C. & Huang, J. (2004). Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging AND bonding. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), 43-57.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in dispersed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273.
Pan, S.L., Newell, S., Huang, J. & Galliers, R.F. (2007). Overcoming knowledge management challenges during ERP implementation: The need to integrate and share different types of knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 404-419.
Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H. & Swan, J. (2003). Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects. Organization Studies, 24(6), 831-857.
Shadbolt, N. & Milton, N. (1999). From knowledge engineering to knowledge management. British Journal of Management, 10(4), 309-322.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Storey, J. & Barnett, E.A. (2000). Knowledge management initiatives: Learning from failure. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 145-156.
Storey, J. & Quintas, P. (2001). Knowledge management and HRM. En J. Storey (Ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (2a ed., pp. 3-20). Londres: Thompson Learning.
Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262-275.
Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R. & Jensen, R.J. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600-613.
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 11-25.
Tsoukas, H. & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge?. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973-993.
Vaughan, D. (1997). The trickle-down effect: Policy decisions, risky work, and the challenger tragedy. California Management Review, 39(2), 80-102.
Wiig, K.M. (1999). What future knowledge management users may expect. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 155-165.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2a ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores dos artigos serão responsáveis dos mesmos e, assim, não comprometam os princípios ou políticas da Universidade Icesi nem do Conselho Editorial da revista Estudios Gerenciales. Os autores autorizam e aceitam a transferência de todos os direitos para a revista Estudios Gerenciales para a publicão impressa ou eletrônica. Após a publicação do artigo, pode ser reproduzido sem a permissão do autor ou da revista, se mencionar o(s) autor(es), o ano, o título, o volume e o número e o intervalo de páginas da publicação, e Estudios Gerenciales como fonte (se abster de utilizar Revista Estudios Gerenciales).
Como Citar
