A SUGGESTED HETERODOX PERSPECTIVE FOR THE STUDY OF FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESSES IN COLOMBIA (Article published in Spanish)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(09)70082-8Keywords:
Family-owned business, orthodox research, heterodox researchAbstract
This paper identifies some orthodox trends in national research on this subject and a set of heterodox approaches used by Anglo-Saxon researchers based on the review of secondary sources such as books, articles, and graduation projects for the purpose of encouraging a reflection and an assessment. The results of this review allowed determining that orthodox theories have had a significant dissemination among Colombian researchers and students. Heterodox approaches, on the contrary, are less well-known and less frequently used. It proposes conducting an in-depth review of this set of recent theories and constructs and evaluating their applicability to achieve an understanding of the idiosyncrasy of family-owned businesses in Colombia as an alternative current of national research.
Downloads
References
Amat, J.M. (2001). La continuidad de la empresa familiar (2da ed.) Barcelona, España: Gestión 2000.
Arregle, J.L., Very, P. y Raytcheva, S. (2002). Capital social et avantages des firmes familiales: proposition dun modèle intégrateur. En AIMS (Ed.), Les Actes de la XI ième Conférence de lAIMS. Disponible e n: http://www.strategie-aims.com/actes02/Fichiers/arregle.pdf
Biosca, D. (2000). Empresa y familia: problemas y soluciones. Barcelona, España: Detur.
Bubolz, M.M. (2001). Family as Source, User and Builder of Social Capital. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 129–131.
Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P. y García-Almeida, D. (2001). The Succession Process from a Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family Firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37-46.
Carney, M. (2007). Minority Family Business in Emerging Markets: Organization Forms and Competitive Advantage. Family Business Review, 20(4), 289-300.
Casillas, J.C., Díaz, C. y Vásquez A. (2005). La gestión de la empresa familiar: conceptos, casos y soluciones. Madrid, España: Thompson.
Chrisman, J., Chua, J. y Steier, L. (2005). Sources and Consequences of Distinctive Familiness: An Introduction. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3), 237-247.
Craig, J. y Moores, K. (2005). Balanced Scorecards to Drive the Strategic Planning of Family Firms. Family Business Review, 18(2), 105-122.
Croutsche, J.J. y Ganidis, B. (2008). Diversité des entreprises familiales. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion: Direction et Gestion, 230, 93-98.
DeNoble, A., Ehrlich, S. y Singh, G. (2007). Toward the Development of a Family Business Self-Efficacy Scale: A Resource-Based Perspective. Family Business Review, 20(2), 127-140.
Dyer, G.W. (2003). The Family: The Missing Variable in Organizational Research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401-416.
Fattoum, S. y Fayolle A. (2008). Limpact de la relation prédécesseur/ successeur sur le déroulement du processus de succession dans les entreprises familiales. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion : Direction et Gestion, 230, 105-112.
Gaitán, A. y Castro, J.D. (2001). Sociedades de familia en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Superintendencia de Sociedades.
Gómez, G.E. (2006). ¿Son iguales todas las empresas familiares? Caminos por recorrer. Bogotá, Colombia: Norma.
Gómez-Mejia, L.R., Nuñez-Nickel, M., y Gutiérrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95.
Gravinski, S. (1994). Factores culturales en los emprendedores y las empresas familiares en Latinoamérica. Publicaciones ICESI, 51, 415-427.
Habbershon, T.G. (2006). Commentary: A Framework for Managing the Familiness and Agency Advantages in Family Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 879-886.
Habbershon, T.G. y Williams, M.L. (1999). A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25.
Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M.L. y MacMillan, I.C. (2003). A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.
Hoelscher, M.L. (2002). The Relationship between Family Capital and Family Business Performance: Collaboration and Conflict as Moderators. Dissertation to obtain the degree of Doctor of Philosoph y, Texas Te ch University, Estados Unidos. Recuperado en Julio 4, 2008 de: http://wallace.tosm.ttu.edu/
Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M. y Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Family Capital Theory. Family Business Review, 19(2), 135-145.
Lee, K., Lim, G. y Lim, W. (2003). Family business succession: appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 657-666.
Lester, R.H. y Cannella, Jr., A.A. (2006). Interorganizational Familiness: How Family Firms Use Interlocking Directorates to Build Community-Level Social Capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Prac tice, 30(6) , 755-775.
Lozano, M. (2000). El protocolo en las empresas de propiedad familiar. Estudios Gerenciales, 74, 49-67. Disponible en: http://bibliotecadigital.icesi.edu.co/biblioteca_digital/bitstream/item/235/ 1/mlozano_p ro to-emp-familiar.pdf
Lozano, M. (2003). Las relaciones intrafamiliares en la empresa familiar. Pensamiento y Gestión, 15, 83-110.
Lozano, M. (2006). La relación intrafamiliar en entornos empresariales. Incursión a un modelo de diagnóstico. Estudios Gerenciales, 22(100), 125-150. Disponible en: http://bibliotecadigital.icesi .edu.co/bib li oteca_digital/bitstream/item/993/1/relacion_intrafamiliar_empresariales.PDF
Lyman, A. (1991). Customer Service: Does Family Ownership Make a Difference? Family Business Review, 4(3), 303-324.
Miller, D., Steier, L. y Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in Time: Intergenerational Succession, Change and Failure in Family Business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
Olavarrieta, S. (2001). Aspectos metodológicos de la investigación cross-cultural. Academia - Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 26, 55-78.
Pearson, A.W., Carr, J.C. y Shaw, J.C. (2008). Toward a Theory of Familiness: A Social Capital Perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949-969.
Poza, E. (1998). La competencia global y la empresa familiar latinoamericana. Revista INCAE, 10(2), 85-94.
Poza, E. (2004). Empresas familiares. México: Thompson.
Romero, L.E. (2006). Competitividad y productividad en empresas familiares pymes. Una aproximación desde la interacción familia-empresa. Revista EAN, 57, 131-142.
Saldarriaga, J.G. (2007). Factores determinantes de la competitividad de las empresas antioqueñas en el contexto de la globalización. AGO.USB, 7(1), 65-76.
Serna, H. y Suárez, E. (2005). La empresa familiar. Estrategias y herramientas para su sostenibilidad y crecimiento. Bogotá, Colombia: Temis.
Sharma, P. (2004). An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1-36.
Steckerl, V. (2006). Modelo explicativo de una empresa familiar que relaciona valores del fundador, cultura organizacional y orientación al mercado. Pensamiento y gestión, 20, 194-215.
Sundaramurthy, C. (2008). Sustaining Trust within Family Businesses. Family Business Review, 21(1), 89-102.
Superintendencia de Sociedades. (2006). Sociedades de Familia en Colombia Año 2005. Recuperado en Junio 9, 2008, de: www.supersociedades.gov.co/imagenes/SOCIED.DE.FLIA1.html
Tokarczyk, J., Hansen, E., Green, M. y Down, J. (2007). A Resource-Based View and Market Orientation Theory Examination of the Role of Familiness in Family Business Success. Family Business Rev iew, 20(1), 1 7-31.
Urrea, J. (2003). Gobernabilidad de la empresa de familia. Revista Universidad EAFIT, 129, 39-50.
Vásquez, L.J. (2006). El capital social en Colombia. Teorías, estrategias y prácticas. Bogotá, Colombia: Contraloría General de la República.
Venter, W.P., Kruger, S. y Herbst, F.J. (2007). A Proposed Conceptual Familiness Transmission of Capital Model. South African Journal of Business Management, 38(3), 1-14.
Ward, J. (Ed.). (2006). El éxito en los negocios de familia: reflexiones sobre el saber no convencional. Bogotá, Colombia: Norma.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are the sole responsibility of their authors, and will not compromise Icesi’s University principles or policies nor those of the Editorial Board of the journal Estudios Gerenciales. Authors authorize and accept the transfer of all rights to the journal, both for its print and electronic publication. After an article is published, it may be reproduced without previous permission of the author or the journal but the author(s), year, title, volume, number and range of pages of the publication must be mentioned. In addition, Estudios Gerenciales must be mentioned as the source (please, refrain from using Revista Estudios Gerenciales).
How to Cite
