Influencia del engagement académico en la lealtad de estudiantes de posgrado: un abordaje a través de un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2016.07.001Palabras clave:
Lealtad, Engagement académico, Compromiso afectivo, Creencias, Autoeficacia académicaResumen
Este estudio se enfocó en medir las creencias de autoeficacia académica, el compromiso afectivo con la universidad y el impacto del engagement académico sobre la lealtad de los estudiantes de posgrado en la prestación de servicios educativos; lo anterior se desarrolló a través de una investigación empírica, no experimental, de naturaleza explicativa y transversal. La unidad de análisis se conformó por estudiantes de posgrado de las áreas de ingeniería, negocios y ciencias sociales. La muestra fue no probabilística aplicada en el área de posgrados de una universidad privada en México, obteniéndose 484 encuestas válidas. Los resultados muestran que la lealtad incrementa en tanto mayor sea el engagement de los estudiantes en su proceso académico. A su vez, tanto las creencias de autoeficacia académica percibida como el compromiso afectivo son predictores de la lealtad, a través del engagement académico.
Descargas
Referencias
Allan, N. P. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of effortful control: comparing a two factor model consisting of hot and cool latent variables and a general domain model [tesis inédita de Maestría]. Florida State University [consultado 9 Sep 2014]. Disponible en: http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/170
Allen, N. J. y Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 847–858.
Allen, N. J. y Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276.
Ahmadi, S. y Cole, D. (2015). Engaging religious minority students. En S. J. Quaye y S. R. Harper (Eds.), Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations (pp. 171–186). New York: Routledge.
Anvari, R. y Seliman, S. (2010). Personal needs assessment approach in strategic training and affective commitment. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 144–157.
Appleton, J. J., Cristenson, S. L., Kin, D. y Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445.
Arguedas, I. (2010). Involucramiento de las estudiantes y los estudiantes en el proceso educativo. REICE: Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 8(1), 63–78.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.
Bakker, A. B. y Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Bejou, D. y Bejou, A. (2012). Shared governance and punctuated equilibrium in higher education: The case for student recruitment, retention, and graduation. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 11(4), 248–258.
Bentler, P. M. (1992). EQS Structural Equation Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMDP.
Bhattacherjee, A. y Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229–254.
Binkhorst, E. (2008). Turismo de co-creación, valor añadido en escenarios turísticos. Journal of Tourism Research, 1, 40–51.
Blanco, H., Martínez, M., Ornelas, M., Flores, F. J. y Peinado, J. E. (2011). Validación de las escalas de autoeficacia en conductas académicas y cuidado de la salud. México: Doble Hélice Ediciones.
Blanco, H., Ornelas, M., Aguirre, J. y Guedea, J. (2012). Autoeficacia percibida en conductas académicas: diferencias entre hombres y mujeres. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 17(53), 557–571.
Bosompra, K. (2001). Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1057–1069.
Bowden, J. L. (2009). The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(1), 63–74.
Brennan, M. B. (2016). Exploring a complex model of student engagement in middle school: Academic self-efficacy beliefs and achievement. Paper 1392. Wayne State University Dissertations.
Bresó, E., Llorens, S. y Salanova, M. (2005). Creencias de eficacia académica y Engagement en estudiantes universitarios. Jornades de Foment de la Investigació [consultado 9 Sep 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.uji.es/bin/publ/edicions/jfi9/psi/6.pdf
Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B. y Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114.
Brown, R. M. y Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education, 58(1), 81–95.
Browne, M. W. y Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. Bollen y J. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Carmeli, A. y Freund, A. (2009). linking perceived external prestige and intentions to leave the organization: The mediating role of job satisfaction and affective commitment. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(3), 236–250.
Casidy, R. y Wymer, W. (2015). The impact of brand strength on satisfaction loyalty and WOM: An empirical examination in the higher education sector. Journal of Brand Management, 22(2), 117–135.
Caspi, A., Entner, W., Moffitt, T. E. y Silva, P. (1998). Early failure in the labor market: Childhood and adolescent predictors of unemployment in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 63, 424–451.
Cermak, D. S. P., File, K. M. y Prince, R. A. (1994). Customer participation in service specification and delivery. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(2), 90–100.
Cheah, W. L., Wan Abdul Manan, W. M. y Zabidi-Hussin, Z. A. M. H. (2010). A structural equation model of the determinants of malnutrition among children in rural Kelantan. Malaysia. Rural and Remote Health, 10(1), 1248–1255.
Chiang, M., Núñez, A., Martín, M. J. y Salazar, M. (2010). Compromiso del trabajador hacia su organización y la relación con el clima organizacional: un análisis de género y edad. Panorama Socioeconómico, 28(40), 92–103.
Chughtai, A. A. (2013). Linking affective commitment to supervisor to work outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(6), 606–627.
Crowley, S. L. y Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 508–531.
Dann, S. (2008). Applying services marketing principles to postgraduate supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(4), 333–346.
Dick, A. S. y Basu, K. (1994). Customer Loyalty: Toward and integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99–113.
Eggert, L. L., Thompson, E. A., Herting, J. R., Nicholas, L. J. y Dickers, B. G. (1994). Preventing adolescent drug abuse and high school dropout through an intensive school-based social network development program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8(3), 202–215.
Fajardo, M., Iroz, M., López, D. y Mirón, S. (2013). Relación entre engagement y las creencias de autoeficacia en los trabajadores. ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de investigación Docencia Creativa, 2(1), 79–1792.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. y Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A. y Swanson, L. (2016). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(1), 223–244.
Garson, G. D. (2010). Testing Statistical Assumptions. Asheboro, USA: Statistical Associates Publishing. Blue Book Series.
Esmark, C. L., Noble, S. M., Bell, J. E. y Griffith, D. A. (2015). The effects of behavioral, cognitive, and decisional control in co-production service experiences. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 423–436.
Globerson, S. y Maggard, M. J. (1991). A conceptual model of self-service. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 11(4), 33–43.
Gottfredson, D. C., Fink, C. y Graham, N. (1994). Grade retention and problem behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 761–784.
Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P. y Ortinau, D. J. (2010). Investigación de mercados. México: McGraw-Hill.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. y Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. London: Prentice Hall International.
Han, J., Yin, H. y Wang, W. (2016). The effect of tertiary teachers' goal orientations for teaching on their commitment: The mediating role of teacher engagement. Educational Psychology, 36(3), 526–547.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M. F. y Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty an approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331–344.
Hemsley-Brown, J. y Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace. A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.
Hill, F. M. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: The role of the student as primary consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(3), 10–21.
Horstmanshof, L. y Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 703–718.
Hu, S. y Kuh, G. D. (2001). Does the degree of campus wiredness matter? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9, 49–53.
Janosz, M., LeBlanc, M., Boulerice, B. y Tremblay, R. E. (1997). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test on two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(6), 733–762.
Johnson, B. y Stevens, J. J. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the school level environment questionnaire (SLEQ). International Journal of Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 325–344.
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341–349.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: Guilford.
Kotzé, T. G. y du Plessis, P. J. (2003). Students as co-producers of education: A proposed model of student socialisation and participation at tertiary institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(4), 186–201.
Krause, K. L. y Coates, H. (2008). Student's engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.
Lam, L. W. y Liu, Y. (2014). The identity-based explanation of affective commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(3), 321–340.
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Claycomb, V. y Inks, L. W. (2000). From recipient to contributor: Examining customer roles and experienced outcomes. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 359–383.
Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. The Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274–280.
Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. y Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825–841.
Luthans, F. y Peterson, S. J. (2002). Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 21(5), 376–387.
Malhotra, N. (2008). Investigación de mercados. Un enfoque aplicado. México D.F.: Pearson.
McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about student university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171–183.
Meyer, J. P. y Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the side-bet theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372–378.
Meyer, J. P. y Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management, 1(1), 61–89.
Mitchell, I. y Carbone, A. (2011). A typology of task characteristics and their effects on student engagement. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 257–270.
Musil, C., Jones, S. y Warner, C. (1998). Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 21, 271–281.
Omar, A. y Urteaga, A. F. (2008). Personal values and organizational commitment. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 13(2), 353–372.
Panaccio, A. y Vandenberghe, C. (2012). Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: The mediating role of positive and negative affective states. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 647–658.
Parameswaran, R. y Glowacka, A. E. (1995). University image: An information processing perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 6(2), 41–56.
Ponce, J. M. (2005). Un nuevo marketing de las universidades. Objetivos formativos y demandas sociales. IV Congreso Internacional de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo. Mercadeo Universitario.
Poon, J. M. (2013). Relationships among perceived career support, affective commitment, and work engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1148–1155.
Randall, G. K., Martin, P., Johnson, M. A. y Poon, L. W. (2012). Successful aging: A psychosocial resources model for very old adults. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–11.
Rayton, B. A. (2006). Examining the interconnection of job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An application of the bivariate probit model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), 139–154.
Rojas Soriano, R. (2005). Guía para realizar investigaciones sociales. México D.F.: Plaza y Valdés.
Salanova, M., Cifre, E., Grau, R., Llorens, S. y Martínez, I. (2005). Antecedentes de la autoeficacia en profesores y estudiantes universitarios: Un modelo causal. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 21(1-2), 159–176.
Schaufeli, W. B. y Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonz, V., Roma, A. y Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two simple confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
Seidel, G. y Back, A. (2009). Success factor validation for global Erp. 17th European Conference on Information Systems [consultado 9 Sep 2014]. Disponible en: http://intranet.iwi.unisg.ch/org/iwi/iwipub.nsf/wwwAuthorPublEng/B6E0C279109F9D89C12577FC003A7AF2/$file/ecis2009-0098.pdf
Sridharan, B., Deng, H., Kirk, J. y Corbitt, B. J. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling for evaluating the user perceptions of E-learning effectiveness in Higher Education. 18th European Conference in Information Systems, ECIS 2010. Pretoria, South Africa.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
Van Gelderen, B. R. y Bik, L. W. (2016). Affective organizational commitment, work engagement and service performance among police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(1), 206–221.
Wixom, B. H. y Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.
Yi, Y. y Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1279–1284.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. y Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavior consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores de artículos serán responsables de los mismos, y por tal no comprometen los principios o políticas de la Universidad Icesi ni las del Comité Editorial de la revista Estudios Gerenciales. Los autores autorizan y aceptan la cesión de todos los derechos a la revista Estudios Gerenciales, tanto en su publicación impresa como electrónica. Luego de publicado el artículo, puede ser reproducido sin autorización, mencionando autor(es), título, año, volumen, número y rango de páginas de la publicación, y como fuente: Estudios Gerenciales (abstenerse de usar Revista Estudios Gerenciales).