Motivaciones de los investigadores académicos en Colombia, para generar y transferir conocimiento al sector productivo usando análisis de correlación canónica

Rafael Antonio Viana Barcelo; Jorge Luis Navarro España; Heidy Mariana Pinto Prieto

doi:10.1016/S0123-5923(12)70219-X

Autores/as

Rafael Antonio Viana Barcelo Docente Investigador, Escuela de Economía y Administración Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia
Jorge Luis Navarro España Docente Investigador, Escuela de Economía y Administración Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia.
Heidy Mariana Pinto Prieto Especialista en formulación y evaluación social de proyectos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(12)70219-X

Palabras clave:

Transferencia de conocimiento, análisis de regresiones canónico, investigadores, universidad-industria.

Resumen

En el presente documento se presenta evidencia empírica acerca de las motivaciones que tienen los investigadores académicos en Colombia, así como también, la disponibilidad de los mismos para generar y transferir conocimiento al sector productivo en el marco de la relación universidadempresa. Los datos utilizados en el estudio se recopilaron a través de una encuesta aplicada a los investigadores académicos que aparecen registrados en la base de datos del Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS). Los datos fueron analizados a través de análisis de regresiones canónico y se logro determinar que las actividades de transferencia de conocimiento objeto del estudio (consultorías y comercialización de tecnología) son complementarias.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Rafael Antonio Viana Barcelo, Docente Investigador, Escuela de Economía y Administración Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia
Jorge Luis Navarro España, Docente Investigador, Escuela de Economía y Administración Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia.
Heidy Mariana Pinto Prieto, Especialista en formulación y evaluación social de proyectos

Referencias

Anderson, T., Daim, T. & Lavoie, F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 27(5), 306–318.

Arrow, K. (1974). Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis. American Economic Review, 64(1), 1–10.

Bessant, J. & Rush, H. (1995). Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy, 24(1), 97–114.

Bercovitz, J. & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.

Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E., Causino, N. & Seashore, L. (1996). Participation Of Life- Science Faculty In Research Relationships With Industry. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355 (23), 1734–1739.

Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29 (4–5), 627–655.

Bozeman, B. & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707.

Daza, T. & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and Administrators Attitudes toward Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70 (3), 309–352.

D'este, P. & Perkmann, M. (2010). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36 (3), 316–339.

Diamant, R. & Pugatch, M. (2007). Measuring Technology Transfer Performance in Public-Private Partnerships. Prepared for the IP Academy in Israel, Meeting of the Tech Transfer Group. Recuperado de: http://www.stockholm-network.org/downloads/publications/ip/Measuring_TT_Performance.pdf.

Fridh, F. & Carlsson, B. (2002). Special issue: Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 199–232.

Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.

Gutiérrez, A., Manjarrés, L. & Vega, J. (2008). University-Industry Relations And Academic Research: Coexistence Or Something Else. INGENIO Working Paper Series 2008-05. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/5217.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.

Heisey, P. & Adelman, S. (2011). Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 38–60.

Helm, R. & Mauroner, O. (2007). Innovation and market characteristics and success of new research-based spin-off products. Jena Research Papers in Business and Economics –Working and Discussion Papers 04/2007, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration.

Jacobson, N., Butterill, D. & Goering, P. (2005). Consulting as a Strategy for Knowledge Transfer. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(2), 299–321.

Jain, S. & George, G. (2007). Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: the case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human Embryonic stem cells. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 535–567.

Jensen, R., Thursby, J. & Thursby, M. (2010). University-Industry Spillovers, Government Funding, and Industrial Consulting. National Bureau of Economic Research-NBER Working Papers. Recuperado de: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15732.pdf?new_window=1.

Lach, S. & Schankerman, M. (2004). Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. Journal of The European Economic Association, 2 (2–3), 252–264.

Landry, R., Amara, N. & Ouimet, M. (2006). Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32 (6), 561–592.

Levy, R., Roux, P. & Wolff, S. (2009). An analysis of science-industry collaborative patterns in a large European University. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(1), 1–23.

Link, A. & Siegel, D. (2005). Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer. European Journal of Finance, 11(3), 169–181.

Link, A., Siegel, S. & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to Engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.

Lockett, A., Wright, M. & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–201.

Mansfield, E. (1975). International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resource Requirements, and Policies. The American Economic Review, 65(2), 372–376.

Marlow, M. (1983). A Canonical Correlation Analysis of Savings and Loan Association Performance. Applied Economics, 15(6), 815–820.

Pack, H. & Todaro, M. (1969). Technological Transfer, Labor Absorption, and Economic Development. Oxford Economic Papers, 21(3), 395–403.

Rodríguez, A. (2005). Un modelo integral para evaluar el impacto de la transferencia de conocimiento interorganizacional en el desempeño de la firma. Estudios Gerenciales, 96(96), 37–50.

Rodríguez, A. (2007). Transferencia de conocimiento en relaciones inter-organizacionales: Su efecto sobre el desempeño de la firma receptora. Estudios Gerenciales, 103(23), 12–35.

Roy, R. (1972). University-Industry Interaction Patterns. Science, 178(4064), 955–960.

Shane, S. (2002). Executive Forum: University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 537–552.

Siegel, D. & Phan, P. (2004). Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: implications for entrepreneurship education. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0426. Recuperado de: http://www.economics.rpi.edu/workingpapers/rpi0426.pdf.

Teece, D. (1977). Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How. The Economic Journal, 87, 242–261.